Author
Senior Markets Analyst, Tradelytic
Marcus Vance is a Senior Markets Analyst at Tradelytic, specializing in Forex market structure, quantitative risk management, and proprietary trading evaluations. With over 8 years of active trading experience across FX, Equity Index Futures, and Crypto, Marcus focuses on helping retail traders bridge the gap between amateur trading and institutional capital management.
Before joining Tradelytic, Marcus successfully passed multiple top-tier prop firm evaluations-including Traderscale -managing over $300,000 in combined funded capital. His hands-on experience navigating static vs. trailing drawdown models, strict daily loss limits, and news trading restrictions gives him a deep, practical understanding of modern prop firm algorithms.
At Tradelytic, Marcus conducts data-driven research on trader psychology, position sizing math, and algorithmic risk parameters. His analytical approach centers on behavioral analytics: identifying common execution leaks-such as revenge trading and over-leveraging-and transforming raw trade logs into actionable, high-expectancy trading strategies.
Calculating position size accurately is the single most important operational discipline in Forex and proprietary trading. In 2026, guessing lot sizes or using fixed lot amounts across different stop-loss distances is the primary cause of accidental daily drawdown breaches. According to risk management guidelines from regulatory bodies like the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), […]
The primary difference between a 1-step evaluation and a 2-step evaluation is the number of profit milestones and the strictness of the drawdown rules. A 1-step challenge grants immediate funded access after hitting a single profit target (typically 9% to 10%), but it comes with tighter trailing drawdown limits. A 2-step challenge requires completing two […]
A plain guide to what Tradelytic is, who it suits, and how the journal turns raw MetaTrader fills into risk and behaviour reporting.
Five tools that watch drawdown and trading behaviour on funded accounts, compared on platform support, alerting and cost.
Journals built for 24/7 crypto markets, compared on exchange sync, fee and funding handling, and what they report back.
What a scaling plan actually requires: targets, timelines, and the consistency rules firms apply before adding capital to your account.
What an automated journal records from MT4, MT5 and cTrader, what it cannot see, and how to review the data without drowning in it.
Most challenges fail on drawdown, not on strategy. Five risk rules for surviving the evaluation and reaching a funded account.
Where cTrader wins on risk tooling and depth of market, where MT5 wins on EAs, and how prop firm platform choice narrows it down.
Challenge fee, position size and payout maths for the $25k, $50k and $100k tiers, and why the biggest account is rarely the right one.
